CREWES 5-year research plan: Towards broadband multicomponent seismology and practical iterated inversion

Gary Margrave, Kris Innanen, Don Lawton, John Bancroft, Michael Lamoureux, and Larry Lines


Seismic images provide the best possible views of the earth below its surface; but, despite an 80 year history, they are still far from optimal. Today, the computer methods used to create such images are transitioning from a standard methodology (SM), which incorporates an evolved blend of physical theory and practical experience, to the very modern full-waveform inversion (FWI) that is much more firmly rooted in mathematical physics. However, this transition is hindered by insufficient low-frequency content in seismic data, by the inherently unknown seismic source waveform, by incompletely understood physics, and by the extreme computational effort required. As a consequence, SM is the dominant approach while FWI is rarely attempted outside of dedicated research labs. SM uses a sophisticated data processing sequence to create a reflectivity image of the subsurface. Then, incorporating well information, an inversion process converts the reflectivity image to earth properties such as impedance. FWI is a fundamentally iterative process that converges on an impedance model by minimizing the difference between real and predicted seismic data. FWI never creates a reflectivity image and does not use well control; while SM does not predict synthetic data and is not iterated. We will create a new class of seismic inversion methods that combines the most robust features of SM with most promising concepts from FWI. From SM, we will retain most of the data processing steps, the creation of a reflectivity image, and the matching to well control. In particular, matching to well control facilitates the source waveform estimation and provides the needed low frequency information. From FWI, we will incorporate the concepts of iteration, prediction of synthetic seismic data, and imaging of the data residual. The proposed approach, which we call IMMI (Iterated Modelling, Migration, and Inversion), will produce estimates of subsurface properties that both match measurements in wells and also predict most features in the recorded seismic data. Such estimates should be much more reliable than those presently achieved by SM. This will have significant benefits to resource exploration and to subsurface environmental studies.

View full article as PDF (0.64 Mb)